ยง

United Biscuit Co. of America

101 N.L.R.B. 1552 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
United Biscuit Co. of America

10 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sunshine Mining Co.

    110 F.2d 780 (9th Cir. 1940)   Cited 54 times

    No. 9162. April 3, 1940. Rehearing Granted, Decree Confirmed June 19, 1940. Petition to Enforce An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition filed by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued by it in proceedings instituted by the board against the Sunshine Mining Company. Judgment enforcing the order as modified. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp and Malcolm F. Halliday, Asst. Gen. Counsels, and Leonard Appel, Atty., all of National Labor

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Tenn. Coach Co.

    191 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 11238. July 9, 1951. Sidney Sherman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn. (Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief; Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  5. Sax v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    171 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 33 times
    In Sax v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 171 F.2d 769 (1948), and N.L.R.B. v. Armour Co., 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 625 (1954), the "perfunctory, innocuous remarks" stood "alone".

  6. Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board

    191 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13275. August 7, 1951. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., Gordon Epstein, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seserman, all of Boston, Mass., Samuel Leiter, Chelsea, Mass., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Frederick U. Reel, Atty. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here upon petition

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Shoe Co.

    111 F.2d 681 (1st Cir. 1940)   Cited 33 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Somerset Shoe Co., 1 Cir., 111 F.2d 681, decided May 9, 1940, the provision was approved without discussion and, apparently, without consideration.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

    179 F.2d 323 (8th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times

    No. 14013. January 16, 1950. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Thomas J. McDermott, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Tucker, St. Paul, Minn. (Connolly, Tucker Post, St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN, and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National

  10. John S. Barnes Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    190 F.2d 127 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times
    In John S. Barnes Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 190 F.2d 127, at page 130, where the company had no anti-union background or pattern of conduct hostile to unionism, this court said: "However, the courts have not considered isolated remarks or questions, which did not in themselves contain threats or promises, and where there was no pattern or background of union hostility, as coercion of the employees and as a violation of ยง 8(a)(1)."