§

United Beef Co., Inc.

277 N.L.R.B. 1014 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
United Beef Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

  4. Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc.

    588 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that the personal knowledge requirement does not apply to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(D)

  5. United States v. Roe

    670 F.2d 956 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that out-of-court statements weren't hearsay when the government used them to show falsity and deception rather than to establish their truth

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Horizon Air Services, Inc.

    761 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming bargaining order because the egregious actions of the employer "constitute a more than ample basis for a sound inference of future interference and/or enduring aftereffects"

  7. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    667 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that employer did not violate employee's right to union representation at investigatory interview where employer requested that the representative not interfere with questioning because the representative was present at the interview, was allowed time to consult with the employee prior to the interview, and was free to make any additions, suggestions, or clarifications after the interview

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Adams Delivery Serv., Inc.

    623 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-7050. July 10, 1980. Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alan S. Levins, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., argued, Paula Gold, San Francisco, Cal., on brief, for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON, SCHROEDER and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: The N.L.R.B. petitions for enforcement of its order requiring respondent Adams Delivery Service, Inc., to reinstate

  9. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,589 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party