§

United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipefitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Afl-Cio, And Its Local, Pipefitters Local Union No. 589 (L & S Plumbing And Heating Of Hibbing, Inc.)

294 N.L.R.B. 616 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipefitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Afl-Cio, And Its Local, Pipefitters Local Union No. 589 (L & S Plumbing And Heating Of Hibbing, Inc.)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Intern. Broth. of Elec. W.

    758 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7355. Argued and Submitted February 7, 1985. Decided April 18, 1985. Christopher Young, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jeffrey L. Cutler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, REINHARDT and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) invokes our jurisdiction under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C

  4. Local Un. 984, Int. Bro., Team., v. Humko

    287 F.2d 231 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 36 times

    Nos. 13896-13898. February 15, 1961. Charles J. Morris and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for appellants. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., L.N.D. Wells, Jr. and Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., George Fitzgerald, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Mullinax, Wells Morris, Dallas, Tex., Goldberg, Previant Cooper, Milwaukee, Wis., Anthony J. Sabella, Memphis, Tenn., George Fitzgerald, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for Local Union 984, et al. Clarence Clifton, Memphis

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 46

    727 F.2d 234 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 5 times

    Cal. No. 151, Docket 83-4045. Argued September 19, 1983. Decided January 31, 1984. Charles P. Donnelly, Washington, D.C. (William Wachter, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Assoc. Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Wash., D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert C. Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa. (Markowitz Richman, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for respondent Local Union No. 46, Metallic Lathers and Reinforcing Iron

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Un. Oper. Engrs

    413 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that "[u]nobjected to hearsay is admissible and is of probative value in the district courts"

  7. Glasser v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 282-285, Dockets 31910-31913. Argued February 19, 1968. Decided May 13, 1968. Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for petitioners. Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Gregory L. Hellrung, Washington, D.C., Attorney), for respondent. Henry Kaiser, Ronald Rosenberg, George B. Driesen, Washington, D.C., Emanuel Dannett, Jacob Silverman, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRIENDLY