ยง

United Artists Communications, Inc.

274 N.L.R.B. 75 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
United Artists Communications, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,302 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Grinding Wheel Co., Inc.

    572 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 45 times
    In Pacific Grinding Wheel, the court recognized that "Board disapproval of proposed terms," "a company's adamant insistence on strong pro-management terms," and "rejection by the employer of terms which were in a previous contract" are not sufficient in themselves to establish bad faith, but are factors which may be considered by the Board with other evidence, and that the "totality of the circumstances may justify a finding of failure to bargain in good faith."

  5. Amax Coal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    614 F.2d 872 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "doing business under ยง 158(e) refers to a continuing business relationship, not to the sale of a facility

  6. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc.

    659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc., 659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981), we held that looking to the substance of an agreement is permissible when it "supports an inference of intent to frustrate agreement where... the entire spectrum of proposals put forward by a party is so consistently and predictably unpalatable to the other party that the proposer should know agreement is impossible."

  8. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 32 times
    Giving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice

  9. Newport News Shipbuilding v. N.L.R.B

    602 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1979)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that employer's proposal to change bargaining unit definition from "designers" to "draftsmen" would not merely affect work assignments but would alter the scope of the bargaining unit, because it would "not only modify the job functions of the various unit members but also affect their right to representation"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Bagel Bakers Council

    434 F.2d 884 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Bagel Bakers Council, supra, we enforced a decision and order of the Board which found that the employers, Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York and sixteen of its constituent members, had committed unfair labor practices in violation of the Act by unlawfully locking out members of Bagel Bakers Union Local 338 of the Bakery and Confectionary Workers International Union of America.