United Aircraft Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 322 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.
434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 30 times
No. 28576. November 2, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, La., David E. Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Spring, Md., for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, William F. Banta, Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges
Chevron Oil, v. N.L.R.B
442 F.2d 1067 (5th Cir. 1971) Cited 24 times
In Chevron Oil Co. v. N.L.R.B., 442 F.2d 1067, 1072 n. 10 (5th Cir. 1971), a company's good faith was evidenced in part by its having successfully negotiated contracts containing the challenged provisions with three other affiliates of the same union.
United Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B
440 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1971) Cited 21 times
Holding that because the prevailing party could have sought review of an adverse determination through cross-appeal, "the general rule that `determinations adverse to the winning litigant do not have conclusive effect as collateral estoppel' should not be applied."
United Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B
434 F.2d 1198 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 20 times
Undertaking extensive review of facts prior to concluding that inadequacy of alternative methods of communication rendered disclosure of employees' names and addresses necessary
Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 26 times
Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel
Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 27 times
In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.
N.L.R.B. v. Dennison Manufacturing Company
419 F.2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1970) Cited 7 times
No. 7304. December 10, 1969. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1970. Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 1264. Baruch A. Fellner, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on brief, for petitioner. Louis Chandler, Boston, Mass., with whom Alan S. Miller and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Dennison Mfg
Laclede Gas Company v. N.L.R.B
421 F.2d 610 (8th Cir. 1970) Cited 7 times
No. 19518. February 4, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 30, 1970. Harold I. Elbert, of Susman, Willer, Rimmel Elbert, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B. and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B. on the brief. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor Local 5-6,

United Aircraft Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

In Chevron Oil Co. v. N.L.R.B., 442 F.2d 1067, 1072 n. 10 (5th Cir. 1971), a company's good faith was evidenced in part by its having successfully negotiated contracts containing the challenged provisions with three other affiliates of the same union.

Holding that because the prevailing party could have sought review of an adverse determination through cross-appeal, "the general rule that `determinations adverse to the winning litigant do not have conclusive effect as collateral estoppel' should not be applied."

Undertaking extensive review of facts prior to concluding that inadequacy of alternative methods of communication rendered disclosure of employees' names and addresses necessary

In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.