§

UNITE HERE Local 26

344 N.L.R.B. 567 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
UNITE HERE Local 26

13 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.

    532 U.S. 200 (2001)   Cited 182 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[i]n the context of tax cases, the IRS's reasonable interpretations of its own regulations and procedures are entitled to particular deference"

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 873 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.

    762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 61 times
    Adopting Restatement (Second) Conflicts of Law § 187

  4. O'Neill v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

    108 F. Supp. 2d 443 (E.D. Pa. 2000)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding award for back pay under ADEA appropriate where plaintiff supported her request with testimony from a financial consultant

  5. Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., Co.

    749 F.2d 1451 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 57 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding tax penalty offset

  6. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab.

    185 F. Supp. 2d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2002)   Cited 21 times
    Holding cost of supplies, such as exhibit tabs and binders, is not recoverable

  7. Gelof v. Papineau

    829 F.2d 452 (3d Cir. 1987)   Cited 39 times
    Reviewing for abuse of discretion district court's decision regarding the rate of prejudgment interest

  8. N.L.R.B.v. Talsol Corp.

    155 F.3d 785 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that an employee's comments about safety at a group meeting attended by employees and management constituted concerted activity because the meeting was conducted to address plant safety concerns, the employee's questions were on the topic of safety, and the context indicated that the employee's statements were “[c]learly ... not purely personal gripes”

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Son, Inc.

    53 F.3d 261 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that four employees who protested reduction in hours and then later refused a contradictory order to work longer hours engaged in concerted activity

  10. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection