Union Terminal Warehouse, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Brown
380 U.S. 278 (1965) Cited 473 times 2 Legal Analyses
Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board
380 U.S. 300 (1965) Cited 350 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Miles v. New York State Teamsters
464 U.S. 829 (1983) Cited 172 times
No. 82-2131. October 3, 1983. ORDER C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 698 F. 2d 593.
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968) Cited 102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Applying Taft
Electric Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B
653 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 13 times
Holding that good faith is “precondition” for impasse
N.L.R.B. v. Hi-Way Billboards, Inc.
500 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1974) Cited 20 times
Reversing Board's finding that impasse is akin to hiatus in negotiations.
N.L.R.B. v. SAC CONST. CO., INC
603 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1979) Cited 9 times
In NLRB v. SAC Construction Co., 603 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1979), the employer argued "that, because the contract involved here is a pre-hire agreement, there is no presumption of majority status under the doctrine of Dee Cee Floor Covering, 97 L.R.R.M. 1072, 1073 (1977)."
Lane v. N.L.R.B
418 F.2d 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1969) Cited 11 times
In Lane v. N.L.R.B., 418 F.2d 1208, 1209-12 (D.C. Cir. 1969), the Supreme Court's approach to § 8(a)(1) and § 8(a)(3) of the Act was described as being in a "state of flux".
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

Union Terminal Warehouse, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Applying Taft

Holding that good faith is “precondition” for impasse

Reversing Board's finding that impasse is akin to hiatus in negotiations.

In NLRB v. SAC Construction Co., 603 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1979), the employer argued "that, because the contract involved here is a pre-hire agreement, there is no presumption of majority status under the doctrine of Dee Cee Floor Covering, 97 L.R.R.M. 1072, 1073 (1977)."

In Lane v. N.L.R.B., 418 F.2d 1208, 1209-12 (D.C. Cir. 1969), the Supreme Court's approach to § 8(a)(1) and § 8(a)(3) of the Act was described as being in a "state of flux".

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions