ยง

Union Carbide Caribe

173 N.L.R.B. 931 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Union Carbide Caribe

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg

    335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 54 times

    No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another ยง 8(a)(5), 29

  2. Harvey Aluminum

    335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 46 times
    In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Douglas County Electric Membership

    358 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Douglas County Electric Membership Corp., 358 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1966), we stated that the specific evidence requirement was an adjunct to the Board's Rules and Regulations that an objection to the conduct of an election shall "contain a short statement of the reasons therefor."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Puritan Sportswear

    385 F.2d 142 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    No. 16538. Argued October 17, 1967. Decided November 1, 1967. Peter Eveleth, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel Leiter, Gordon Leiter, Boston, Mass. (Herbert L. Turney, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: A refusal of

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit