§

Uniloc 2017 LLC

IPR2020-00115 (P.T.A.B. May. 12, 2020)
Uniloc 2017 LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee

    136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016)   Cited 271 times   164 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board's interpretation of the petition to have implicitly presented a challenge was unreviewable

  2. Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.

    821 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 119 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding a reply brief and declaration exceeded the proper scope for a reply because they cited "a number of non-patent literature references which were not relied upon to support unpatentability in the Petition"

  3. Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC

    Case No. 2:18-CV-00493-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2020)

    Case No. 2:18-CV-00493-JRG-RSP Case No. 2:18-CV-00499-JRG-RSP Case No. 2:18-CV-00502-JRG-RSP 01-20-2020 UNILOC 2017 LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE LLC Defendant. ROY S. PAYNE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On January 10, 2020, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 6,836,654 (Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-493), 8,194,632 (Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-499), and 8,407,609 (Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-502)

  4. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 375 times   631 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  5. Section 324 - Institution of post-grant review

    35 U.S.C. § 324   Cited 42 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Requiring threshold determination that it is "more likely than not that at least 1 of the claims . . . is unpatentable"

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A