§
Uncle Lee's

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 501 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. Chemvet Laboratories, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    497 F.2d 445 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 21 times
    Holding threats of plant closure are "the most potent" instruments of employer interference

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferguson

    257 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 38 times

    No. 16973. June 30, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Ralph W. Malone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is a Petition by the Board for enforcement of an Order, 118 N.L.R.B. No. 30, finding the Employer, Shovel Supply Company, guilty of 8(a)(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), violations and requiring the reinstatement of four

  6. Filler Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 369 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times
    In Filler Products Inc. v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 369, 378 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1967), the court reiterated that "[o]ne of the established ways to determine in disputed cases when an employee is discharged is to ascertain when he was replaced."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Commonwealth Foods, (West End)

    506 F.2d 1065 (4th Cir. 1974)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that employees who were illegally fired for engaging in union activities should not be reinstated to their jobs if on rehearing the Board determined that the employees stole from their employer

  8. San Francisco Loc. Joint Exec. Bd. v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 73-1489, 73-1579 and 73-1605. Argued April 5, 1974. Decided June 21, 1974. David Nevins, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Barry S. Jellison and David J. Salniker were on the brief for petitioners. Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, were on the brief, for respondent

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Evans Packing Company

    463 F.2d 193 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 12 times
    In Evans, the evidence was clear that the complaining employee was speaking on behalf of others who were equally concerned about overtime pay.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,109 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"