Ultra-Sonic De-Burring, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Anchor Coupling Co. v. U.S.
401 U.S. 908 (1971) Cited 78 times
Camping pack sacks containing marijuana
Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.
337 U.S. 656 (1949) Cited 88 times
Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
N.L.R.B. v. Apico Inns of California, Inc.
512 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir. 1975) Cited 14 times
In Apico, the employee denied reinstatement had forced another employee to quit due to his sexual advances, had been drunk on the job, had made profane and derogatory remarks about management in the presence of customers, and had solicited a fellow employee to engage in prostitution.
Conolon Corporation v. N.L.R.B
431 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 6 times
No. 24796. August 4, 1970. Roy E. Potts (argued), Victor F. Yacullo of Kindel Anderson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Leonard M. Wagman (argued), Sanford H. Fisher, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Dominick L. Manoli, Arnold Ordman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.; Ralph E. Kennedy, Reg. Director, N.L.R.B., Arnold, Smith Schwarts, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge Honorable William M. Byrne, Sr. United States District Judge, Central
Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964) Cited 11 times
No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company
357 F.2d 919 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 1 times
No. 6548. Heard February 9, 1966. Decided March 15, 1966. Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion Griffin, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. Fernando Ruiz-Suria, San Juan, P.R., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and MARIS and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. By designation. COFFIN, Circuit Judge. On this petition for enforcement of an order of the National
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Ultra-Sonic De-Burring, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Anchor Coupling Co. v. U.S.

Camping pack sacks containing marijuana

Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

N.L.R.B. v. Apico Inns of California, Inc.

In Apico, the employee denied reinstatement had forced another employee to quit due to his sexual advances, had been drunk on the job, had made profane and derogatory remarks about management in the presence of customers, and had solicited a fellow employee to engage in prostitution.

Conolon Corporation v. N.L.R.B

Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

N.L.R.B. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"