§

Ubisoft, Inc. v. Guitar Apprentice, Inc.

13553310 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 1, 2016)
Ubisoft, Inc. v. Guitar Apprentice, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC

    792 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 637 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a means-plus-function term is indefinite "if a person of ordinary skill in the art would be unable to recognize the structure in the specification and associate it with the corresponding function in the claim"

  2. Net Moneyin v. Verisign

    545 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 283 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to anticipate, a single prior art reference must not only disclose all the limitations claimed but also must disclose those limitations "arranged or combined in the same way as recited in the claim"

  3. Fresenius USA v. Baxter International

    582 F.3d 1288 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 86 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party cannot preserve an argument if it presents "only a skeletal or undeveloped argument to the trial court"

  4. Guitar Apprentice, Inc. v. Ubisoft, Inc.

    97 F. Supp. 3d 965 (W.D. Tenn. 2015)

    No. 2:13–cv–02903–JPM–tmp. 02-26-2015 GUITAR APPRENTICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UBISOFT, INC., Defendant. John Francis Triggs, Ryan Daniel Levy, Patterson Intellectual Property Law. P.C., Nashville, TN, Amy Pepke, Butler Snow LLP, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff. Douglas F. Halijan, Shea B. Oliver, Burch Porter & Johnson, Memphis, TN, Eric Buresh, Michelle Marriott, Mark Lang, Erise Ip, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for Defendant. JON P. McCALLA, District Judge. John Francis Triggs, Ryan Daniel Levy, Patterson

  5. Section 112 - Specification

    35 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 7,399 times   1051 Legal Analyses
    Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it

  6. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 6,020 times   1020 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"

  7. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 408 times   201 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  8. Section 318 - Decision of the Board

    35 U.S.C. § 318   Cited 161 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Governing the incorporation of claims added via the operation of § 316(d)

  9. Section 42.104 - Content of petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.104   Cited 28 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Describing the content of the petition, including both "the patents or printed publications relied upon for each ground," and "supporting evidence relied upon to support the challenge"

  10. Section 42.73 - Judgment

    37 C.F.R. § 42.73   Cited 18 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Regarding judgments

  11. Section 90.2 - Notice; service

    37 C.F.R. § 90.2   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)For an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 . (1) (i) In all appeals, the notice of appeal required by 35 U.S.C. 142 must be filed with the Director by electronic mail to the email address indicated on the United States Patent and Trademark Office's web page for the Office of the General Counsel. This electronically submitted notice will be accorded a receipt date, which is the date in Eastern Time when the correspondence is received in the Office, regardless of whether that date is a Saturday, Sunday,