U-Wanna-Wash Frocks, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.
380 U.S. 263 (1965) Cited 168 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 times
Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969) Cited 37 times
Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.
121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 85 times 2 Legal Analyses
In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.
Boaz Spinning Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 27 times
Denying enforcement of Board order reinstating an employee who accused the plant manager in presence of other employees at a meeting of being "no different than Castro"

U-Wanna-Wash Frocks, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.

Boaz Spinning Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Denying enforcement of Board order reinstating an employee who accused the plant manager in presence of other employees at a meeting of being "no different than Castro"