§

U-Tote M of Oklahoma, Inc.

179 N.L.R.B. 829 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
U-Tote M of Oklahoma, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  4. Fairmont Foods Company v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 828 (4th Cir. 1969)

    No. 12680. Argued January 10, 1969. Decided February 28, 1969. Carl D. Hall, Tulsa, Okla. (John M. Keefer, and Hall Sublett, Tulsa, Okla., on brief) for petitioner. Seth D. Rosen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for respondent. Before BOREMAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court upon petition of Fairmont Foods