U-Haul of California

11 Cited authorities

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.

    500 U.S. 20 (1991)   Cited 3,073 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cosmair, Inc.

    821 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1987)   Cited 114 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a former employee was protected from his employer's discontinuance of severance pay under the ADEA's anti-retaliation provision
  6. Dunkin' Donuts Mid-Atlantic v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.3d 437 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 10 times
    Enforcing In re Aldworth Co., 338 NLRB 137
  7. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  9. E.E.O.C. v. U.S. Steel Corp.

    671 F. Supp. 351 (W.D. Pa. 1987)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that similar punitive waiver provision violated section 623(d) just by raising the "mere possibility" that individuals would be deterred from participating in ADEA claims
  10. Isla Verde Hotel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    702 F.2d 268 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 5 times

    No. 82-1427. Argued February 8, 1983. Decided March 14, 1983. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1983. Rafael Buscaglia, Jr., Hato Rey, P.R., with whom Pedro Maldondo Silva, Hato Rey, P.R., was on brief, for petitioner. Paul E. Bateman, Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  11. Section 626 - Recordkeeping, investigation, and enforcement

    29 U.S.C. § 626   Cited 6,129 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the statute of limitations under the Portal-to-Portal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 255