10 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Carpenters S. Cal. Admin. Corp. v. Russell
726 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1984) Cited 139 timesHolding attorney's fees may be awarded under § 1132(g) to employers who successfully defend actions brought against them under § 1145
Operating Eng. Pension Trust v. Gilliam
737 F.2d 1501 (9th Cir. 1984) Cited 113 timesHolding that an employer had a valid contract defense where a union representative told him that he was signing an agreement to operate a bulldozer for a single union project, but the written agreement actually contained a collective bargaining agreement covering all of the employer's employees
Capitol-Husting Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
671 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1982) Cited 50 timesFinding that the "Union acted reasonably in relying" on Capitol-Husting's offer to match financial package offered by rival company that the Union was also negotiating with, such that Capitol-Husting was acting in bad faith to claim that Union's failure to expressly accept this offer nullified its obligation to abide by the contract
Caporale v. Mar Les, Inc.
656 F.2d 242 (7th Cir. 1981) Cited 20 timesIn Caporale, this Court refused to find that a contract existed between the employer and the union because the terms of the agreement had never been provided specifically to the defendant-employer and there had been no mutual assent to the terms of the agreement.
Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B
687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982) Cited 16 timesHolding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"
N.L.R.B. v. Miller Brewing Company
408 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 timesNo. 22698. February 20, 1969. John D. Burgoyne (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David C. Nevins, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Willard Z. Carr, Jr. (argued) of Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge. Hon. Harry Pregerson, United States District Judge, Los Angeles
United Steelworkers of America v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.
321 F. Supp. 235 (N.D. Ala. 1969) Cited 2 timesCiv. A. No. 69-601. December 2, 1969. George C. Longshore, Cooper, Mitch Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., Bredhoff, Gottesman Cohen, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. C.V. Stelzenmuller, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr Murray, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW McFADDEN, District Judge. This cause coming on to be heard unto the court without the intervention of a jury on October 14, 1969, upon full and fair consideration of evidence adduced upon the trial of the cause
Oregon Ind. Groc. Ass'n v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, Etc.
236 F. Supp. 825 (D. Or. 1964)Civ. No. 64-178. October 29, 1964. Gunther F. Krause, Krause, Lindsay Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for plaintiff. Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield, Or., for defendants. KILKENNY, District Judge. This is an action under Sections 301 and 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 and 186. Defendants challenge the jurisdiction of the court under either section. Plaintiff is an Oregon corporation acting for and in behalf of certain employers' committees, the employers of meat cutters and butcher
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal AnalysesApplying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions