§

Turner Construction Co.

110 N.L.R.B. 1860 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Turner Construction Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc.

    211 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that hiring practices after a grievance was filed "would be a factor for the board's consideration" but that the NLRB easily could reason that subsequent hiring practices were reactionary to the grievance and did not accurately reflect the prior hiring arrangement

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  5. Del E. Webb Const. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    196 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 14428, 14446. May 6, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mark C. Curran, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Charles B. Blackmar, Kansas City, Mo. (Henry I. Eager, and Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager, Swanson Midgley, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for Del E. Webb Const. Co. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo. (Clif. Langsdale

  6. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. INT'L UNION, ETC

    216 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15064. November 3, 1954. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and WOODROUGH and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. GARDNER, Chief Judge. This is a petition by

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Star Pub. Co.

    97 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 465, branch managers were held to be employees, while in National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 488, a foreman was reinstated upon the ground that he had been unfairly discharged.

  8. Wilson Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1941)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 496, 497. November 10, 1941. Rehearing Denied November 29, 1941. Petitions to Review Orders of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Wilson Co., Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board issued against petitioner pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act. The National Labor Relations Board, in its answer, requested enforcement of its order. Order modified, and, as so modified, affirmed and enforced. Paul Ware, of Chicago, Ill. (James