Tulsa Typographical Union No. 403

2 Cited authorities

  1. Typographical Union v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 705 (1961)   Cited 19 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 340. Argued March 1, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. In collective bargaining negotiations, two unions demanded that the agreement require the employers to comply with union rules "not in conflict with" federal law and that foremen must be union members and do the hiring, but that they should be responsible only to the employers. Union insistence upon these demands led to a deadlock in the negotiations and a strike. The employers

  2. International Typographical Un. v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 5509, 5510. Heard December 2, 1959. Decided May 10, 1960. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1960. Robert M. Segal, Boston, Mass., and Gerhard Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., with whom Arthur J. Flamm, Boston, Mass., Henry Kaiser, George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., Segal Flamm, Boston, Mass., Van Arkel Kaiser, Washington, D.C., and Dickstein, Shapiro Galligan, New York City, were on brief, for petitioners. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott