§
TRW, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  5. Daniel Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 805 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 36 times
    In Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), this court considered the identical question presented here. The Board, having found that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) during the course of an election campaign and that such conduct had interfered with the employees' free choice, set the election aside, and ordered that a new election be held. The company sought review of both matters in this court.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wagner Iron Works

    220 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 48 times

    Nos. 11121, 11141. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Maurice Alexandre, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Albert J. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bridge, Structural Ornamental Iron Workers Shopmen's Local 471 (AFL). Morris Karon, Milwaukee, Wis., for Wagner Iron Works. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., for International Union, United Automobile

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.

    327 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming Board finding of coercive interrogation where officials threatened that "if a union got in," then "everything would be wiped clean"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Morris Fishman and Sons, Inc.

    278 F.2d 792 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12986. Argued December 7, 1959. Decided May 13, 1960. Melvin Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Avins, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James L. Price, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richman, Price Jamieson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. BIGGS, Chief Judge. This is a petition

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Kingsford

    313 F.2d 826 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    No. 14977. February 28, 1963. William J. Avrutis, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx, Robertson, Hoebreckx Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Before CECIL, Chief Judge, MILLER, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge. BOYD, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board