TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Ernst Haas Studio, Inc. v. Palm Press, Inc.

    164 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that, where a brief does not sufficiently address an argument, courts are under no obligation to "scour the record, research any legal theory that comes to mind, and serve generally as an advocate"
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. Celanese Polymer Specialties Co.

    840 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 80 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to award fees based on lack of documentation when counsel failed to keep contemporaneous time records, but furnished affidavits and corroborative business records
  3. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A

  4. Section 42.22 - Content of petitions and motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.22   Cited 14 times   16 Legal Analyses

    (a) Each petition or motion must be filed as a separate paper and must include: (1) A statement of the precise relief requested; and (2) A full statement of the reasons for the relief requested, including a detailed explanation of the significance of the evidence including material facts, and the governing law, rules, and precedent. (b)Relief requested. Where a rule in part 1 of this title ordinarily governs the relief sought, the petition or motion must make any showings required under that rule

  5. Section 42.204 - Content of petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.204   Cited 1 times   2 Legal Analyses

    In addition to the requirements of §§ 42.6 , 42.8 , 42.22 , and 42.24 , the petition must set forth: (a)Grounds for standing. The petitioner must certify that the patent for which review is sought is available for post-grant review and that the petitioner is not barred or estopped from requesting a post-grant review challenging the patent claims on the grounds identified in the petition. (b)Identification of challenge. Provide a statement of the precise relief requested for each claim challenged