§

Trus Joist MacMillan

341 N.L.R.B. 369 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Trus Joist MacMillan

9 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  3. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  4. Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Steinerfilm, Inc.

    669 F.2d 845 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    Ordering reinstatement of employee discharged for intemperate reaction to discipline for protected activities

  6. Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 217 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 91-1964, 91-2146. Argued December 6, 1991. Decided May 26, 1992. Michael S. Mitchell, Stephen P. Beiser (argued), McGlinchey, Stafford, Cellini Lang, New Orleans, La., for Missouri Portland Cement Co. Jerry Hunter, Lisa N. Richardson (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. DBM, Inc.

    987 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 1 times

    No. 91-3729. Submitted November 9, 1992. Decided March 5, 1993. Harry W. Zanville, Waterloo, IA, argued, for petitioner. Vincent Falvo, Washington, DC, argued, for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, LAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOKEN, Circuit Judge. LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Following a lengthy evidentiary hearing, the National Labor Relations Board concluded that respondent DBM, Inc., violated §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor

  8. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"

  9. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    547 F.2d 792 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 6 times
    Distinguishing between spontaneous and pre-meditated actions