Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC d/b/a Trump International Hotel Las Vegas

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  3. U.S. v. Kitsap Physicians Service

    314 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 449 times
    Holding that defendants did not engage in spoliation of evidence when records were intentionally destroyed in accordance with a document retention policy and state regulations before litigation commenced
  4. Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

    522 U.S. 948 (1997)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues
  7. Steam Press Holdings v. Hawaii Teamsters

    302 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff estopped from alleging claim for breach of contract, because plaintiff, prior to filing suit, had repudiated contract
  8. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  9. BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Electric Co.

    531 F. App'x 784 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 4 times

    No. 11-16846 D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00181-DAE-KSC 06-21-2013 BLUEEARTH BIOFUELS, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.; MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD.; ALOHA PETROLEUM, LTD.; KARL E. STAHLKOPF, Individually, Defendants - Appellees. NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

  10. Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. National Labor rel

    515 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    No. 05-75515. Argued and Submitted October 16, 2007. Filed January 28, 2008. Kristin Martin (argued), Richard G. McCracken, Davis, Cowell, Bowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Brian Herman (argued), Mark J. Ricciardi, Fisher Phillips, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for intervenor Reorganized Aladdin Gaming, LLC. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  12. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,079 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB