§

Trudy Morales, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01a52708 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 17, 2005)
Trudy Morales, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,366 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  2. Walker v. Ford Motor Co.

    684 F.2d 1355 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 157 times
    Holding that plaintiff established hostile environment where racial harassment made plaintiff “feel unwanted and uncomfortable in his surroundings,” even though it was not directed at him

  3. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,596 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  4. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,346 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  5. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,273 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  6. Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.107   Cited 472 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint

  7. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 137 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"

  8. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"