ยง

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local 592

181 N.L.R.B. 790 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Truck Drivers & Helpers Local 592

8 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  2. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  3. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  5. Sales Drivers, Etc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    229 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times
    Noting that "the fact of concerted activity at a common situs where one not common was available" does not itself establish a secondary boycott violation

  6. International B. of Elec. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times

    No. 22146. Argued February 26, 1969. Decided April 16, 1969. Mr. Dixon L. Pyles, Jackson, Miss., with whom Mr. Laurence J. Cohen, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. David C. Nevins, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., National

  7. Brown Transport Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times
    In Brown Transport Corp. v. NLRB, 334 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1964), in which the picket signs made clear that picketing was directed only to the employees of the primary employer and no one else, see id. at 31, the court held that "[t]here is simply no excuse for picketing where the message is seen by neutral employees of neutral employers but is not seen at all by the employees of the primary employer," id. at 39.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Local 294

    284 F.2d 887 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 14 times

    No. 26, Docket 26130. Argued September 26, 1960. Decided November 10, 1960. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. FRIENDLY, Circuit