§

Troy Hills Nursing

326 N.L.R.B. 1465 (N.L.R.B. 1998)
Troy Hills Nursing

10 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Caremore, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    129 F.3d 365 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where LPNs do not have the authority to issue written warnings without higher approval or to terminate or suspend nurses aides, the Board's determination that the LPNs do not actually discipline or effectively recommend discipline was supported by substantial evidence

  3. Mid-America Care Found. v. Ntl. Lab. rel

    148 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron deference does not "extend to an interpretation [of a statute] taken solely in connection with an agency's litigation position in a particular case or set of cases."

  4. Providence Alaska Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    121 F.3d 548 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 26 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that charge nurses were not statutory supervisors

  5. Beverly Enterprises v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    148 F.3d 1042 (8th Cir. 1998)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Nursing home

  6. Glenmark Assoc. v. National Labor Rela. Board

    147 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nurses were supervisors given their authority to schedule and discipline nursing assistants without management approval

  7. Beverly Enterprises-Pennsylvania v. N.L.R.B

    129 F.3d 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that CN evaluations did not manifest authority to "promote" and "reward" where CNAs' wages and benefits were governed by a collective-bargaining agreement

  8. Passavant Retire. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    149 F.3d 243 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 7 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[b]ecause of the Board's `special competence' in the field of labor relations, its interpretation of the Act is accorded special deference" and noting that "[w]hether a [bargaining] unit is appropriate involves a large measure of informed discretion vested in the Board and is rarely to be disturbed"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit