Triple A Fire Protection, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
  3. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  4. Hickerson v. City of New York

    525 U.S. 1067 (1999)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdiction to grant a divorce may exist without jurisdiction to adjudicate the parties' property rights
  5. Conway v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

    466 U.S. 937 (1984)   Cited 113 times
    Holding that marijuana is a "resource" and that the defendant "obtained" constructive possession of a "substantial" amount of this resource when he arranged for the transportation of 4,800 pounds of marijuana from South Carolina to New York City
  6. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. G T Terminal Packaging Co.

    246 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 37 times
    Holding restoration order to be unduly burdensome because company did not have enough space to accommodate the disputed work operation
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition
  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Triple A Fire Protection, Inc.

    136 F.3d 727 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 14 times
    Finding per se violation of the NLRA's prohibition against direct dealing where employer "deal[t] directly with employees outside the normal channels of collective bargaining" in an attempt "to dissuade employees from supporting the union and create incentives for them to abandon their support for the union"
  10. Stone Boat Yard v. N.L.R.B

    715 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that knowledge possessed by union members was not attributable to union because there was no evidence in the record that the members were agents of the union