§

Trinity Services Group, Inc.

28-CA-212163 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 7, 2018)
Trinity Services Group, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. United States v. Peacock

    654 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 71 times
    In United States v. Peacock, 654 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1981), a witness testified about comments made by her deceased husband concerning a telephone conversation he had just finished.

  3. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  4. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pratt & Whitney Air Craft Division, United Technologies Corp.

    789 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 33 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer statement that the union was "thoughtless and irresponsible" and that it was on "a collision course" was neither coercive nor implied that employees should abandon the union

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours

    750 F.2d 524 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Finding that a supervisor's act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor's statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct

  7. Oaktree Capital Mgmt. L.P. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2011)   Cited 3 times
    Finding that the involvement of a corporate owner of a resort in the "underlying incidents" giving rise to the litigation was evidence of centralized control of labor relations

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. Webco Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    217 F.3d 1306 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer violated the NLRA by allowing one representative group to campaign on work property while prohibiting another from campaigning

  10. Weis Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.3d 239 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 98-1892, 98-2017. Argued January 27, 1999. Decided September 11, 2001. ARGUED: Robert Lewis, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, Woodbury, NY, for Weis Markets. Robert Paul Joy, Morgan, Brown Joy, Boston, MA, for Amicus Curiae. Julie Brock Broido, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Board. Carey Robert Butsavage, Butsavage Associates, P.C., Washington, DC, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Roger S. Kaplan, Steven I. Farbman, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, Woodbury

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,623 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,987 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities