§

Trinity Carpentry and Systems

02-CA-036578 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 17, 2006)
Trinity Carpentry and Systems

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  2. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Lewis

    935 F.2d 1428 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 134 times
    Finding that storing personal possessions at a property and using the property's address for certain purposes "does not replace personal contact" for determining residency

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

  4. Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

  5. J. Vallery Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.3d 446 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times
    Finding alter ego bound to collective bargaining agreement

  6. Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Collecting standards

  7. Wilson Trophy Co. v. N.L.R.B

    989 F.2d 1502 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 21 times
    Affirming Board's finding that the employer promulgated a rule in violation of § 8 where the warehouse supervisor told employees not to discuss wages

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second