§
Triec, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Peerless of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Peerless, we stated that the Board's decision to issue such an order must be accompanied by "`specific findings' as to the immediate and residual impact of unfair labor practices on the election process... and `a detailed analysis' assessing the possibility of holding a fair election... and the potential effectiveness of ordinary remedies."

  4. Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that the NLRB possessed substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that a supervisor violated § 158 when he told employees that he heard from ownership that unionization would lead to the owners shutting down the plant

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WKRG-TV, Inc.

    470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 33 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts

  6. Red Barns System, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    574 F.2d 315 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 1 times
    Stating that district court has "broad discretion to determine when party convenience or the interest of justice make a transfer appropriate"