§

Triangle Publications, Inc.

204 N.L.R.B. 651 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Triangle Publications, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  2. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 40 times
    In Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970), which the Board cites, the Fifth Circuit focussed on the context of the misconduct as the key to deciding whether the misconduct was protected by the Act.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Fibers International Corp.

    439 F.2d 1311 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 27 times
    Striking employee intimidated nonstriking employee

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Business Forms Corp.

    474 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 24 times
    Timing and abruptness of discharge are persuasive evidence of motivation

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Red Top, Inc.

    455 F.2d 721 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    In Red Top, supra, the Eighth Circuit held that a hospital maintenance firm did not violate the Act by discharging employees who, inter alia, threatened to contact the hospital which contracted with the firm regarding a labor dispute. It held that unlawful interference with an employer's commercial interests presents grounds for discharge.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gladding Keystone Corporation

    435 F.2d 129 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 18 times

    No. 183, Docket 34924. Argued November 9, 1970. Decided December 29, 1970. Frank H. Itkin, Atty., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Russell J. Thomas, Jr., Attys., on the brief), for N.L.R.B. William L. Bergan, Syracuse, N.Y. (Bond, Schoeneck King, Francis D. Price, Syracuse, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and LEVET, District Judge

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Princeton Inn Company

    424 F.2d 264 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 15 times
    In NLRB v. Princeton Inn Co., 424 F.2d 264 (C.A.3, 1970), the Board found that a union adherent's foul and abusive language toward a female employee was pretext for discharge, considered against his prior usage of similar language without warning, and the employer's background of antiunion bias, and the fact that a supervisor present did not admonish the employee.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hanes Hosiery Div., Hanes Corp.

    413 F.2d 457 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 12 times

    No. 12981. Argued May 8, 1969. Decided July 18, 1969. Susan Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William Wachter, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. W.S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Douglas P. Murray and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. BUTZNER, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations