§

Tri-County Roofing

311 N.L.R.B. 1368 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Tri-County Roofing

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Northbrook Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Brewer

    493 U.S. 6 (1989)   Cited 106 times
    Holding direct action provision inapplicable when insurer is plaintiff

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  5. United States v. Local 30, United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers Ass'n

    871 F.2d 401 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 16 times
    Upholding the remedy as making "due provision" for the rights of innocent persons, even though the remedy interfered with the innocent union members' right to have the union govern itself

  6. Boilermakers Local No. 374 v. N.L.R.B

    852 F.2d 1353 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.

  7. U.S. v. Local 30, United Slate, Tile Etc.

    686 F. Supp. 1139 (E.D. Pa. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    Establishing "decreeship" which retained new union leadership but imposed close court scrutiny and appointed "liaison officer" between union and court

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union 1058, United Mine Workers

    957 F.2d 149 (4th Cir. 1992)   Cited 7 times
    Requiring the principal to have made some manifestation to the third party

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Acme Mattress Co.

    192 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 10441. November 7, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gerald F. Krassa, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Isadore Katz, David Jaffe, New York City, for respondent. Before KERNER, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered on October 18, 1950, against respondents