§

Trend Mills, Inc.

154 N.L.R.B. 143 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Trend Mills, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Incorporated

    274 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 61 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 5 Cir., 274 F.2d 381, the unit consisted of 332 employees of which 167 constituted a majority.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B

    185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief

  5. Steadman v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

    138 F.2d 691 (4th Cir. 1943)   Cited 5 times

    No. 5105. November 12, 1943. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston; J. Waties Waring, Judge. Action by James Gordon Steadman against Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company for alleged breach of a contract of employment. From a judgment upon a directed verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. J. Wesley Crum, of Denmark, S.C. (Thos. M. Boulware, of Barnwell, S.C., on the brief), for appellant. Douglas McKay, of Columbia

  6. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"