§
Tre-Vill, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Chair Company

    361 F.2d 283 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 24 times

    No. 10000. Argued November 4, 1965. Decided May 6, 1966. Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. R.D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Josey Hardy, Greensboro, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge. MICHIE, District Judge. This case comes before

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Longhorn Transfer Service, Inc.

    346 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times

    No. 21347. June 15, 1965. Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James J. Loeffler, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge. This is a proceeding to enforce an order

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Harry F. Berggren Sons, Inc.

    406 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Enforcing the Board's finding that an employer violated Section 8 by conducting a formal "poll" which took place in a non-coercive atmosphere, but which met only four of the five components of the Struksnes standard