§

Travel Network, Ltd. v. World Travel Service, Inc.

No. 91088447 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 15, 1999)
Travel Network, Ltd. v. World Travel Service, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. Electronic Design Sales v. Electronic Sys

    954 F.2d 713 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that purchaser confusion is the "primary focus" and, in case of goods and services that are sold, "the inquiry generally will turn on whether actual or potential `purchasers' are confused"

  3. Jean Patou, Inc. v. Jacqueline Cochran, Inc.

    201 F. Supp. 861 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)   Cited 56 times
    Finding the mark JOY suggestive when used for a fragrance

  4. Jean Patou, Inc. v. Jacqueline Cochran, Inc.

    312 F.2d 125 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 53 times
    Affirming district court with special emphasis on fact that defendant's use of JOY OF BATHING appeared in conjunction with other textual phrases

  5. King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen

    496 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 9245. June 6, 1974. J. Timothy Hobbs, Washington, D.C. (Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C.), attorney of record, for appellant. William B. Mason, Arlington, Va. (Mason, Mason Albright, Arlington, Va.), attorney of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 178 USPQ 121 (1973)

  6. Witco Chemical Co. v. Whitfield Chemical

    418 F.2d 1403 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 11 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8207. December 18, 1969. Sidney Wallenstein, Chicago, Ill., attorney of record, for appellant. Ben Cohen, Washington, D.C., Charles B. Spangenberg, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. William C. McCoy, Jr., Robert D. Hart, McCoy, Greene Howell, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, MATTHEWS, Judge, sitting by designation, and ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges. RICH, Acting Chief Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal

  7. Bellbrook Dairies v. Hawthorn-Mellody Farms

    253 F.2d 431 (C.C.P.A. 1958)   Cited 20 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6337. March 21, 1958. William G. MacKay, San Francisco, Cal. (Charles R. Allen, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Byron, Hume, Groen Clement, Chicago, Ill. (Samuel Lebowitz, Washington, D.C., and Milton T. Miller, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee. Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, RICH, and JACKSON (retired), Judges. O'CONNELL, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, acting for the Commissioner

  8. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 94,339 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint