§

Transport Service Co.

314 N.L.R.B. 458 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Transport Service Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Overseas Motors, Inc.

    818 F.2d 517 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times

    No. 86-5225. Argued February 2, 1987. Decided May 11, 1987. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nancy Hunt (argued), Peter Winkler, Bernard Gottfried, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Patrick McNamara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. J. Laevin Weiner (argued), C. Robert Wartell, William E. Sigler, Maddin, Weiner, Hauser, Wartell and Roth, Southfield, Mich., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY, JONES and NORRIS, Circuit

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Transport Service Co.

    973 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    No. 91-2049. Argued January 17, 1992. Decided August 26, 1992. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard R. Kofkin (argued), Fagel Haber, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before FLAUM, and MANION, Circuit Judges, and CURRAN, District Judge. Hon. Thomas J. Curran, District

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Laborers' Int. Union, N. America

    748 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times
    Declining to deduct expenses for transportation, lodging and meals that the discriminatees would have incurred had they been employed during the backpay period

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Sumco Mfg. Co., Inc.

    746 F.2d 1189 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 1 times

    No. 80-1686. Submitted September 28, 1984. Decided November 1, 1984. Elliott Moore, Linda Weisel, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harvey B. Rector, Labor Consultant, Ohio, Joseph O'Leary, Akron, Ohio, for respondents. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This is the second time this case has been brought before this court for decision. In the first instance