Tradesmen International

18 Cited authorities

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
376 U.S. 254 (1964) Cited 7,008 times 36 Legal Analyses
Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
N.A.A.C.P. v. Button
371 U.S. 415 (1963) Cited 2,221 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Virginia failed to "justify the broad prohibitions" imposed through a barratry law, but enjoining the statute only as applied to the politically oriented litigating efforts of the NAACP
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B
81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer
Beverly Health and Rehabilitation v. N.L.R.B
297 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2002) Cited 11 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center
916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990) Cited 17 times
Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”
N.L.R.B. v. Vanguard Tours. Inc.
981 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1992) Cited 13 times
Holding that an overbroad rule was unlawful because of the "likely chilling effect of such a rule"
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,317 times 84 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Tradesmen International

18 Cited authorities

Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice

Holding that Virginia failed to "justify the broad prohibitions" imposed through a barratry law, but enjoining the statute only as applied to the politically oriented litigating efforts of the NAACP

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities

Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

Holding that an overbroad rule was unlawful because of the "likely chilling effect of such a rule"

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355