§

T.P. Saddle Blanket & Trading, Inc. v. Tasha McCarter

No. 92025246 (T.T.A.B. Jul. 18, 2001)
T.P. Saddle Blanket & Trading, Inc. v. Tasha McCarter

5 Cited authorities

  1. Bishop v. Equinox International Corp.

    154 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that theory of unjust enrichment based on a property theory of trademark rights in which a plaintiff can recover for an "infringer's use of the markholder's property to make a profit" "has long been the rule in this Circuit"

  2. Person's Co., Ltd. v. Christman

    900 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign use is not sufficient to establish priority rights even over a United States competitor who took mark in bad faith

  3. Cerveceria Centroamericana v. Cerveceria

    892 F.2d 1021 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the absence of evidence of intent to resume use during the period of non-use, the TTAB "may conclude the registrant has . . . failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment," even when there is evidence of intent to resume after the period of nonuse

  4. P. A. B. Produits, Etc. v. Satinine Societa

    570 F.2d 328 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 13 times

    Appeal No. 77-589. February 16, 1978. Robert J. Patch, Washington, D.C. (Young Thompson, Arlington, Va.), attorneys of record, for appellant. G. Franklin Rothwell, Washington, D.C. (Sughrue, Rothwell, Mion, Zinn Macpeak, Washington, D.C.), attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Associate Judges. LANE, Judge. Registrant appeals from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board)

  5. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,031 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark