Town & Country Electric

31 Cited authorities

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden

    503 U.S. 318 (1992)   Cited 1,508 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.

    447 U.S. 102 (1980)   Cited 1,840 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that information obtained in response to a FOIA request was a "public disclosure" for purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Act
  3. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid

    490 U.S. 730 (1989)   Cited 1,169 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general common law of agency, we consider the hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the product is accomplished" and listing several factors relevant to this inquiry
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  5. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
  6. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  7. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning
  8. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")
  9. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  10. Powell, Chief v. Dellums

    438 U.S. 916 (1978)   Cited 230 times
    Holding that Capitol Grounds regulations are limited in their ability to restrict individual or group conduct, such that, for Capitol Grounds regulations to be valid, "the conduct would have to be more disruptive or more substantial (in degree or number) than that normally engaged in by tourists and others and routinely permitted on the [Capitol] Grounds"
  11. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,360 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials