§

Town And Country Nursing Home, Inc.

291 N.L.R.B. 74 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Town And Country Nursing Home, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  4. Lima v. N.L.R.B

    819 F.2d 300 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 1 times

    No. 86-1182. Argued February 10, 1987. Decided May 19, 1987. David M. Silberman, with whom Harry Huge, Gary K. Harris, Allison Beck and Laurence Gold, were on brief, for petitioner. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson and Barbara A. Atkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent

  5. Bromine Division, Drug Research v. N.L.R.B

    621 F.2d 806 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    No. 77-1732. April 28, 1980. Dee Edwards, Royal Oak, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Paul Spielberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Kathy L. Krieger, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KEITH, KENNEDY and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER Petitioner Drug Research, Inc., seeks review of the Board's order and the Board seeks enforcement of its order determining