§

Top Security Patrol, Inc.

226 N.L.R.B. 46 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Top Security Patrol, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. River Togs, Inc.

    382 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. River Togs, Inc. (2d Cir. July 27, 1967) 382 F.2d 198, however, we recognized some of the limitations of the authorization card procedure, calling for scrutiny of the manner of execution of the cards.

  3. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.2d 1296 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 21797, 22090. Argued May 6, 1969. Decided June 20, 1969. Mr. Robert T. Snyder, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,797. Mr. Brown Hill Boswell, Charlotte, N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C., was on the brief, for intervenors

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Betts Baking Co.

    428 F.2d 156 (10th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Betts Baking Co., 428 F.2d 156, 159 (10th Cir. 1970), the court wrote that the offer was valid despite the time restriction because "[w]e think that [the employee's] failure to complain of the time limitation precludes him from complaining of the reasonableness of the reporting time."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. City Dyeing

    178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Electric City Dyeing Co., 178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950), this court had occasion to rule on a comparable situation where the employer alleged that certain employees were discharged for unsatisfactory work whereas the Board made a finding, in which we concurred, that the dismissals were for union activity.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys