Toma Metals, Inc.

20 Cited authorities

  1. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
  2. Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Seven Bar

    466 U.S. 958 (1984)   Cited 182 times
    Discussing HHS' decision to interpret "reasonable volume of services" as requiring a finite measure
  3. Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    804 F.2d 808 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 423 times
    Timing and departure from past practice indicates unlawful motive
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  6. AT&T v. N.L.R.B

    67 F.3d 446 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 32 times

    Nos. 1796, 1938, 1939, Docket Nos. 94-4232, 95-4018, 95-4020. Argued June 12, 1995. Decided: September 29, 1995. Order Clarifying Decision on Rehearing September 29, 1995. Francis X. Dee, Newark, NJ (Stephen F. Payerle, Carpenter, Bennett Morrissey; Anna R. O'Connor, Berkeley Heights, NJ; and Thomas Stomski, Piscataway, NJ, of counsel), for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. David Habenstreit, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Acting Associate

  7. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Emsing's Supermarket, Inc.

    872 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 32 times
    Granting enforcement of an NLRB order to an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, including failing to make certain contractual payments after a CBA's expiration, and noting that "[a]n employer may not make changes in the terms and conditions of employment reflected in an expired [CBA; i]nstead, the employer must maintain the status quo after the expiration of a [CBA] until a new agreement is reached or until the parties bargain in good faith to impasse"
  9. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience
  10. Holo-Krome Company v. N.L.R.B

    954 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 23 times
    Denying petition for rehearing