§

Tom Rice Buick, Pontiac & GMC Truck

334 N.L.R.B. 785 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Tom Rice Buick, Pontiac & GMC Truck

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. 6 West Ltd. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    237 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that employer's discharge of employee did not violate NLRA because "companies must be able to discharge a thief or an untruthful employee"

  4. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 97-70646, 97-70841 Argued and Submitted April 13, 1998 — San Francisco, California. Filed June 22, 1998 Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 32-CA-13189 COUNSEL Allen J. Gross, Mitchell, Silberberg Knupp, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner-cross-respondent. James S. Scott A. Donald Rhoads, National Labor Relations Board, Oakland, California; Aileen A. Armstrong, Office of the General Counsel, National

  5. Harpercollins v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    79 F.3d 1324 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 8 times
    Finding a § 8 violation where there was evidence of "an implicit threat of repercussions for union loyalty, as opposed to company loyalty"