Toledo Lithographers

6 Cited authorities

Elgin, J. E.R. Co. v. Burley
325 U.S. 711 (1945) Cited 815 times
Holding that 45 U.S.C. § 153 vests in each individual rail employee the right to share in negotiations over his grievance; to have notice of his NRAB hearing; to be heard before the NRAB; and to bring an enforcement suit
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 334 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Typographical Union v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 705 (1961) Cited 19 times
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 340. Argued March 1, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. In collective bargaining negotiations, two unions demanded that the agreement require the employers to comply with union rules "not in conflict with" federal law and that foremen must be union members and do the hiring, but that they should be responsible only to the employers. Union insistence upon these demands led to a deadlock in the negotiations and a strike. The employers
Hughes Tool Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd.
147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945) Cited 60 times
In Hughes Tool Co. v. NLRB, 147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945), the court dealt with a prior version of § 9(a) which did not expressly guarantee the Union's right to be present at the adjustment of grievances. Nevertheless, the court found that such a right existed, and stated that it could be waived.
International Typographical Un. v. N.L.R.B
278 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1960) Cited 15 times
Nos. 5509, 5510. Heard December 2, 1959. Decided May 10, 1960. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1960. Robert M. Segal, Boston, Mass., and Gerhard Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., with whom Arthur J. Flamm, Boston, Mass., Henry Kaiser, George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., Segal Flamm, Boston, Mass., Van Arkel Kaiser, Washington, D.C., and Dickstein, Shapiro Galligan, New York City, were on brief, for petitioners. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Toledo Lithographers

6 Cited authorities

Elgin, J. E.R. Co. v. Burley

Holding that 45 U.S.C. § 153 vests in each individual rail employee the right to share in negotiations over his grievance; to have notice of his NRAB hearing; to be heard before the NRAB; and to bring an enforcement suit

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Typographical Union v. Labor Board

Hughes Tool Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

In Hughes Tool Co. v. NLRB, 147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945), the court dealt with a prior version of § 9(a) which did not expressly guarantee the Union's right to be present at the adjustment of grievances. Nevertheless, the court found that such a right existed, and stated that it could be waived.

International Typographical Un. v. N.L.R.B

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"