§
Toledo Hospital

5 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Peters

    777 F.2d 1294 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 11 times

    No. 84-2636. Argued September 11, 1985. Decided December 2, 1985. Walter F. Kelly, Sutton Kelly, Milwaukee, Wis., for appellants. Lawrence O. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Before WOOD, COFFEY and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Walter Kelly and Sandra Hays purchased a parcel of property from the United States. The government had obtained the property through criminal

  2. Nightingale Oil Co. v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 528 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 6 times

    No. 89-1886. Heard March 8, 1990. Decided June 6, 1990. Christopher J. Perry with whom Neil Jacobs, Lynne McCarthy, and Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Julie B. Broido, Atty., with whom William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent. Petition for review of order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge

  3. Hamilton Test Systems, N.Y., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    743 F.2d 136 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 7 times
    Finding unit determination appropriate

  4. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 1 times

    No. 546, Dockets 91-4117, 91-4145. Argued December 5, 1991. Decided February 19, 1992. S. Richard Pincus, Chicago, III. (Joshua D. Holleb, Fox and Grove, Chartered, Joseph M. Kehoe, Jr., Sears, Roebuck Co., of counsel), for petitioner-cross-respondent. Fred L. Cornnell, Washington, D.C. (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, D. Randall Frye, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles Donnelly, Supervisory Atty., N.L.R.B., of counsel), for respondent-cross-petitioner

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Parsons School of Design

    793 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 4 times
    In Parsons and Hamilton, the election notice from the NLRB to the employees described a bargaining unit different from the one ultimately established and did not alert employees to the possibility of change.