§
TNS, Inc.

50 Cited authorities

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.

    447 U.S. 102 (1980)   Cited 1,834 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that information obtained in response to a FOIA request was a "public disclosure" for purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Act

  2. Begier v. Internal Revenue Service

    496 U.S. 53 (1990)   Cited 815 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the segregation of funds was not a prerequisite to the establishment of a statutory trust under the Internal Revenue Code

  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

    464 U.S. 238 (1984)   Cited 916 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state award of punitive damages to person injured in nuclear incident did not conflict with federal remedial scheme regulating safety aspects of nuclear energy

  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills

    353 U.S. 448 (1957)   Cited 2,314 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

  5. Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers

    414 U.S. 368 (1974)   Cited 369 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes

  6. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 993 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  7. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 868 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 320 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  9. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  10. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 469 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  11. Section 185 - Suits by and against labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 185   Cited 14,555 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts jurisdiction over breach of contract claims arising out of collective bargaining contracts

  12. Section 651 - Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 651   Cited 1,488 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Noting the OSH Act arose from concern surrounding "personal injuries and illnesses arising out of work situations"

  13. Section 2011 - Congressional declaration of policy

    42 U.S.C. § 2011   Cited 423 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that- (a) the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security; and (b) the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to promote

  14. Section 2201 - General duties of Commission

    42 U.S.C. § 2201   Cited 139 times
    Granting the NRC regulatory jurisdiction over the constituent materials of spent nuclear fuel

  15. Section 2021 - Cooperation with States

    42 U.S.C. § 2021   Cited 120 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the NRC to enter into agreements with states providing for the discontinuance of federal regulatory authority

  16. Section 5801 - Congressional declaration of policy and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 5801   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Development and utilization of energy sources The Congress hereby declares that the general welfare and the common defense and security require effective action to develop, and increase the efficiency and reliability of use of, all energy sources to meet the needs of present and future generations, to increase the productivity of the national economy and strengthen its position in regard to international trade, to make the Nation self-sufficient in energy, to advance the goals of restoring, protecting

  17. Section 2012 - Congressional findings

    42 U.S.C. § 2012   Cited 61 times

    The Congress of the United States makes the following findings concerning the development, use, and control of atomic energy: (a) The development, utilization, and control of atomic energy for military and for all other purposes are vital to the common defense and security. (b) Repealed. Pub. L. 88-489, §1, Aug. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 602. (c) The processing and utilization of source, byproduct, and special nuclear material affect interstate and foreign commerce and must be regulated in the national

  18. Section 143 - Saving provisions

    29 U.S.C. § 143   Cited 54 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require an individual employee to render labor or service without his consent, nor shall anything in this chapter be construed to make the quitting of his labor by an individual employee an illegal act; nor shall any court issue any process to compel the performance by an individual employee of such labor or service, without his consent; nor shall the quitting of labor by an employee or employees in good faith because of abnormally dangerous conditions

  19. Section 19.12 - Instruction to workers

    10 C.F.R. § 19.12   Cited 3 times
    Requiring education of workers concerning hazards of radiation