§
T&J Trucking Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Avecor, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    931 F.2d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 68 times
    Noting that inferences drawn from expertise may "reduce the weight of evidence necessary to impute knowledge ... but ... do not wholly eliminate the need for evidence"

  5. Synergy Gas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    19 F.3d 649 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 18 times
    Reversing finding of discrimination where company introduced personnel records to demonstrate that other employees had been terminated for actions similar to that of the complaining employee

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  7. GSX Corp. of Missouri v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    918 F.2d 1351 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Reviewing board's findings more critically where board's findings are contrary to ALJ's

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Del Rey Tortilleria, Inc.

    787 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 20 times

    No. 85-1199. Argued January 7, 1986. Decided April 2, 1986. Joseph Oertel, Dep. Assoc. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving M. Geslewitz, Adams, Fox, Adelstein Rosen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WOOD and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) petitions this court to enforce an order requiring respondent

  9. Somerset Welding Steel, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    987 F.2d 777 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 11 times
    Finding no adequate justification for Gissel order because "the Board did not adequately consider changes in management and employee turnover at the Company since the time of the election"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Horizon Air Services, Inc.

    761 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming bargaining order because the egregious actions of the employer "constitute a more than ample basis for a sound inference of future interference and/or enduring aftereffects"