§
Titus, LLC

13 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing

    174 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 130 times
    In Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing (9th Cir. 1949) 174 F.2d 676, cert. denied 338 U.S. 860, 70 S.Ct. 101, 94 L.Ed. 527, rehearing den. 339 U.S. 945, 70 S.Ct. 793, 94 L.Ed. 1360, this Court relied upon Consolidated Edison to hold that hearsay alone, or even hearsay corroborated by a mere scintilla could never provide substantial evidence to support an administrative finding.

  6. Passaic Daily News v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 1543 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 26 times
    Finding that the order "impermissibly attempts to compel the [newspaper] to publish what it would prefer to withhold in violation of the First Amendment"

  7. M.W. Kellogg Constructors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    806 F.2d 1435 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 85-7078, 85-7167 and 85-7170. Argued and Submitted January 6, 1986. Decided December 30, 1986. William C. Bottger, Jr., Latham Watkins, Thomas W. Shreve, Los Angeles, Cal., for Kellogg. Jeffrey L. Cutler, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for Local 250. Jerrold Wohlegemuth, Sandra S. Elligers, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WALLACE and SCHROEDER, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Broth. of Elec. Workers

    668 F.2d 991 (8th Cir. 1982)   Cited 4 times

    No. 81-1491. Submitted November 12, 1981. Decided January 21, 1982. Richard Michael Fischl, William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, David R. Marshall, Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Benjamin J. Francka, Springfield, Mo., for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 453. Appeal from the National Labor

  9. Steves Sash Door Company v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 676 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times

    No. 24767. October 3, 1968. Theodore F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Richard S. Rodin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Steves Sash Door Company petitions this Court pursuant to Section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board. The Board

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease