§

Tito Contractors, Inc.

366 NLRB No. 47 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Tito Contractors, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    804 F.2d 808 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 423 times
    Timing and departure from past practice indicates unlawful motive

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  4. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  5. Autonation, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 7 times
    Finding employer's claim that it fired employee due to job abandonment to be a pretext because employer knew that employee had filed for unemployment benefits and was under the impression that he had already been terminated and yet the company did nothing to correct the employee's alleged misimpression

  6. Munir v. Scott

    12 F.3d 213 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 19 times
    Listing substantially similar factors

  7. Manor Care of Easton, PA., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    661 F.3d 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

    Nos. 10–1411 11–1011. 2011-11-22 MANOR CARE OF EASTON, PA., LLC, doing business as Manorcare Health Services–Easton, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Service Employees International Union Healthcare Pennsylvania (SEIU Healthcare PA), Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board.Charles P. Roberts, III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Clifford H. Nelson Jr. Kellie Isbell

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. DBM, Inc.

    987 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 1 times

    No. 91-3729. Submitted November 9, 1992. Decided March 5, 1993. Harry W. Zanville, Waterloo, IA, argued, for petitioner. Vincent Falvo, Washington, DC, argued, for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, LAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOKEN, Circuit Judge. LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Following a lengthy evidentiary hearing, the National Labor Relations Board concluded that respondent DBM, Inc., violated §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations