§

Titan Tire Corporation; Titan Tire Corporation of Freeport; Titan Tire Corporation of Bryan

13-CA-046757 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 12, 2012)
Titan Tire Corporation; Titan Tire Corporation of Freeport; Titan Tire Corporation of Bryan

6 Cited authorities

  1. Certiorari Denied

    534 U.S. 818 (2001)   Cited 16 times
    Concluding employer entitled to judgment as matter of law where employee offered no evidence of number and types of positions available in local job market that did not require heavy or medium lifting

  2. Alwin Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    192 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the striking employees' motivation for striking is central to a finding of an unfair labor practice strike

  3. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  4. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that when, among other factors, a new negotiator was substituted, "the lack of a significant bargaining history would dictate giving the parties a fuller opportunity to effect an agreement than occurred here"

  5. United States v. Mason

    661 F.2d 45 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that no Fourth Amendment violation occurred when defendant came to doorway as agents approached the house and was then placed under arrest

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second