Timet

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.
  3. ARO, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    596 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 33 times
    In ARO, Inc. v. NLRB, 596 F.2d 713, 718 (6th Cir. 1979), this court held, "For an individual claim or complaint to amount to concerted action under the Act it must... be made with the object of inducing or preparing for group action...."
  4. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 50 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."
  5. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 38 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Northern Metal Company

    440 F.2d 881 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 34 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Northern Metal Company, 440 F.2d at 884-85, the Court, branding the finding of "constructive concerted activity" in Interboro as a pure "legal fiction," said it was "unwilling to adopt such a fiction.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Empire Gas, Inc.

    566 F.2d 681 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 4 times
    Following Mushroom Transp. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964)